Endorsements

This year’s primary election gave the members of CN&R’s editorial board fits. In some cases, it’s because we’re not happy with the incumbents in certain races, yet we don’t feel comfortable with their challengers being able to do the job competently—at least from the get-go—because they lack substantive experience.

After several rounds of deliberations, however, we reached consensus. There’s a lot riding on the outcome of this election, so we encourage each one of our readers to make it to the polls on June 7. As always, we urge voters to do their own research. The League of Women Voters of California website, votersedge.org/ca, is an excellent resource.

Supervisors—District 1: Bill Connelly; District 5: Doug Teeter; District 4: Steve Lambert. Butte County faces financial challenges in the coming years, including figuring out a way to pay for fire protection. Given that the incumbents have kept the coffers solvent, and that their challengers have little to no public-service experience, we are endorsing them despite some reservations based on their actions at the dais—namely, not having the guts to ban fracking.

Measure E: Yes. This is an easy one. Whether or not the local geography is conducive to hydraulic fracturing, the latest research concludes that fracking can, indeed, contaminate groundwater. Let’s also remember that there’s a fracked well in Glenn County. Simply put, we cannot allow the Tuscan Aquifer—the source of our drinking and ag water—to be jeopardized now or ever by fracking.

Measure G: No. Medical marijuana is already not covered under the Right to Farm Act because it’s not federally legal. Adding this verbiage serves only to keep Butte County behind the times if and when growing pot becomes legal in the U.S. Don’t buy the pro-G signs saying it “supports public safety.” It has absolutely nothing to do with public safety.

Measure H: No. The voters approved Measure A, the medical marijuana cultivation ordinance, after years of haggling. If it still doesn’t work (and it does have problems), the county should consider the suggestions of all interested parties, not just the one dropping the hammer.

Prop. 50: No. The intention of this constitutional amendment sounds great at first blush. A politician has been suspended, accused of a crime, but is still drawing a paycheck? Not cool. What Prop. 50 would do is halt pay for suspended members of the Legislature on a two-thirds vote. But what about due process? Everyone deserves it, even pols. Furthermore, lawmakers can already hand down sanctions, including expulsion.

State Assembly, District 3: Edward Ritchie

Steve Stokes. The life-long Los Angeleno wants to reinstate Glass-Steagall, opposes the Trans-Pacific Partnership and wants to end Citizens United. Sounds similar to the views of a Vermont senator we like.

Jim Reed. Reed is solid on progressive issues. We respect Chico Republican Joe Montes’ local work, including his efforts establishing a youth court, but his support of Trump and his vow to defund Planned Parenthood mean he’s cut from the same cloth as incumbent Doug LaMalfa, who did both of those things recently.

Democrat: Bernie Sanders. This one was an easy consensus. Sanders is authentic. He opposes a U.S. plutocracy. He has been consistent throughout his career on core issues, including civil rights, and has the will to take on corporate interests. Don’t give in to establishment talking points. Vote for the person who truly is looking out for the middle class, and who, incidentally, has a much better chance of beating Donald Trump.

Republican: No endorsement. A Trump presidency spells disaster for our nation. Period.