Big oil and clean energy
Ballot measure would pull the rug out from under the fast-growing clean-tech industry
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4c206/4c206a564e6953648998b3acbfae0104b83e034d" alt=""
It is no secret that the recession is posing challenges for Northern California businesses. Yet our business is growing. Why? Largely because we manufacture products that cater to Americans who believe in a clean-energy future, and because we have become energy efficient ourselves.
Our commitment to the environment is what motivates us to come to work every day. It drives us to provide a trusted brand and a portfolio of quality products aimed at helping humanity solve the environmental challenges ahead.
Our business is not alone in embracing this philosophy. Between 1995 and 2008, California’s “clean-tech” businesses increased 45 percent in number and 36 percent in employment, according to NextTen, a nonpartisan think tank. The Silicon Valley-based Collaborative Economics group says California now has more than 3,000 clean-tech businesses that account for 44,000 jobs.
California’s emerging clean-energy economy has attracted nearly $6.5 billion in capital investment in the last three years, says the National Venture Capital Association. In 2008 alone, California-based companies received almost 60 percent of all clean-tech investments in the United States, with a record $3.3 billion in 111 separate ventures. Five of the nation’s top 10 cities for clean-tech investment are in the Golden State, according to a recent New York Times article.
This is just the beginning. AB 32, the state’s pioneering road map to a clean-energy economy, will generate another 112,000 jobs by 2020, according to a UC Berkeley study. The California Air Resources Board foresees increased economic production of $33 billion as a result of the law, as well as increased overall gross state product of $7 billion and increased personal income of $16 billion.
Unfortunately, Assemblyman Dan Logue (R-Linda) wants to put these jobs and economic investments at risk. He has submitted a measure for the November ballot funded by Texas oil companies that would pull the rug out from under the fastest-growing segment of California’s economy. They have poured more than $2.5 million into a campaign to buy their way onto our state’s ballot.
The debate over the dirty-energy proposition could well determine our state’s economic future: Will the next steps toward California’s new clean-energy economy be reversed mid-course, jeopardizing tens of thousands of jobs and billions in investment? Or will our state continue to lead the world in the transition to a clean-energy economy?